Case 1801735/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss J Samuels v Inmind Children Personnel Ltd and 1 other — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801735/2019
- Decision date
- 6 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Miss J Samuels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by telephone at Leeds on 5 June 2019 before Employment Judge Maidment. The judgment dated 6 June 2019 records that the Claimant, Miss J Samuels, had complaints against the First Respondent, Inmind Children Personnel Ltd, and the Second Respondent, Soteria House Limited.
The tribunal did not determine the complaints on their merits. Instead, it recorded that the Claimant withdrew her complaints against the First Respondent and that those complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. The extracted judgment text does not identify the legal basis of the complaints or make any factual findings on liability.
No monetary award is recorded, and the judgment contains no remedy assessment. The text also does not record any outcome in relation to the Second Respondent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that the Claimant withdrew her complaints against the First Respondent and that they were dismissed on that basis. No substantive merits findings are recorded in the judgment text. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.