Mr K Majid v Santander UK plc — 2025

Case reference: 1801743/2025
Decision date: 18 November 2025
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
Venue: Leeds

Indexed: 19 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr K Majid

Respondent

Santander UK plc

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing at Leeds on 18 November 2025, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The judgment records that the claim was struck out pursuant to rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.

The tribunal stated that the claim had no reasonable prospect of success. Reasons were given orally at the hearing, and the written record does not provide further findings or a breakdown of the issues.

Claims and outcomes

2 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Whistleblowing	The written judgment records only that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The public listing category identifies Public Interest Disclosure, but the written judgment does not set out the particulars.	Struck out	—	—
Race discrimination	The written judgment records only that the claim was struck out under rule 38 because it had no reasonable prospect of success. The public listing category identifies Race Discrimination, but the written judgment does not set out the particulars.	Struck out	Race	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.