Case 1801749/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Tobias v TransUnion International UK Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 1801749/2025
- Decision date
- 26 March 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Wilkinson Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Tobias
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out the claim in its entirety pursuant to rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024. The stated grounds were that the claim had no reasonable prospects of success and that it was no longer possible to have a fair hearing of the claim.
The written judgment records that oral reasons were given at the hearing. No written reasons are included in the provided text, and no remedy or monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies age discrimination. The judgment itself is a short rule 38 strike-out record and does not set out the factual allegations or written reasons. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Disability discrimination | The gov.uk listing category identifies disability discrimination. The judgment itself is a short rule 38 strike-out record and does not set out the factual allegations or written reasons. | Struck out | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.