Case 1801766/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms Victoria Glover v Continental de Nurr. Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801766/2022
- Decision date
- 14 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Evans
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms Victoria Glover
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Victoria Glover brought a claim against Continental de Nurr. Ltd, heard remotely by Employment Judge Evans sitting alone at Leeds on 14 June 2022. The respondent did not present a response, did not attend the hearing, and was not represented. The tribunal amended the respondent's name from “Continental de Nurr” to “Continental de Nurr. Ltd”.
This was a Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant the compensation due to her under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 on the termination of her employment in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. The respondent was ordered to pay £478.47.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working time regulations | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent failed to pay compensation due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 on termination in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement. | Upheld | — | £478 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £478
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.