Case 1801771/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Waqar v Vision Care Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801771/2022
- Decision date
- 10 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Waqar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Shepherd heard the case at Leeds on 18, 19 August and 4 and 5 October 2022, with the claimant represented by Mr Lunat and the respondent by Mr Umezuruike. The judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal was not well founded and was dismissed.
The tribunal also recorded that the breach of contract claim, brought in respect of failure to pay wages, was not well founded and was dismissed. No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and the supplied text does not set out any separate remedy calculation or additional findings beyond the two dismissals.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The claim was pleaded as breach of contract in respect of failure to pay wages. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.