Case 1801777/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs M Hanning v Independent Financial Adviser Limited and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801777/2020
- Decision date
- 17 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs M Hanning
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a judgment on withdrawal under rule 52. The tribunal recorded that the complaints against the first respondent, Independent Financial Adviser Limited, were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, Mrs M Hanning. The extracted text does not identify the substantive legal basis of those complaints.
The judgment also records that the remaining claims against the second respondent, Rosebridge (Skipton) Limited, were to proceed to a hearing listed for 9 to 12 November 2020. No substantive findings on those remaining claims are included in this decision, and no remedy was awarded in the extracted text. The judgment was sent to the parties on 17 June 2020.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment is a rule 52 withdrawal decision. It states that the complaints against the first respondent were dismissed following a withdrawal by the claimant, but it does not identify the underlying cause of action in the extracted text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.