Case 1801833/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Baker v McMillan Daley LLP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 Under the provisions of — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801833/2022
- Decision date
- 9 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Baker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal upheld Miss H Baker's unlawful deduction of wages claim. It recorded that she had made arrangements with the Department for Work and Pensions to discharge the liability referred to in the respondent's letter of 10 May 2022, that the respondent had already made statutory deductions for tax and national insurance, and that the respondent failed to pay the net amount to her. The tribunal therefore declared that an unauthorised deduction from wages had occurred and ordered payment of the net sum due, £6,318.25, by 17 August 2022.
The tribunal also upheld the itemised pay statement claim. It found that the claimant received no itemised pay statement for April 2022 and that the statements for November 2021, February 2022, March 2022 and May 2022 contained inaccuracies. The judgment sets out the corrected figures, including April 2022 gross pay of £3,166.67 and net pay of £2,415.46, November 2021 gross pay of £1,727.27 and net pay of £1,479.87, February 2022 net pay of £2,970.31, March 2022 net pay of £2,411.81, and May 2022 gross pay of £719.70 and net pay of £782.11, together with holiday pay that should have been recorded at £657.69 gross and £439.01 net.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal declared that the claimant had suffered an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered the respondent to pay the net sum due, £6,318.25, by 17 August 2022. The judgment records that the respondent had already made statutory deductions for tax and national insurance and had failed to pay the net amount to the claimant. | Upheld | — | £6,318 |
| Other | Itemised pay statement claim under Part I of the ERA 1996. The tribunal declared that the respondent failed to give an itemised pay statement for April 2022 and found inaccuracies in the itemised pay statements for November 2021, February 2022, March 2022, and May 2022. No separate monetary award is stated for this claim. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,318
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £6,318
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.