Case 1801833/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Aksiuk v Carewise Consultancy — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801833/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Aksiuk
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Aksiuk presented a claim against Carewise Consultancy, and the respondent did not present a valid response on time. The Employment Judge therefore issued a Rule 21 judgment on 6 June 2023 without a hearing, and the listed hearing on 8 June 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal held that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. It ordered Carewise Consultancy to pay the claimant £1,991.12 gross. No other claim types, separate heads of loss, or additional remedy components were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,991.12 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,991 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,991
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.