Case 1801884/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Anthony Swift v Whats Running Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801884/2023
- Decision date
- 30 May 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Anthony Swift
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 17 April 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Rogerson decided that a determination could properly be made under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 5 June 2023 was cancelled.
The tribunal declared that Whats Running Ltd had made unauthorised deductions from Anthony Swift's wages in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the net sum of £2,276.21.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal declared that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages in respect of unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay and ordered payment of the net sum. | Upheld | — | £2,276 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,276
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.