Case 1801891/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Khurshid Anwar v Sky Subscribers Services Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801891/2022
- Decision date
- 22 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flanagan
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Khurshid Anwar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the case at Leeds Employment Tribunal by CVP on 22 August 2022, before Employment Judge Flanagan sitting alone. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment dismissed the claimant's claims for non-payment of wages and unlawful deduction from wages, finding each was not well founded. It also dismissed the breach of contract claims concerning unpaid holiday pay and notice pay, and the compromise agreement signed on 10 November 2021, finding those claims were not well founded.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismissed the claim described as non-payment of wages as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment dismissed the claim described as unlawful deduction from wages as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the breach of contract claim for unpaid holiday pay and notice pay as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment dismissed the breach of contract claim relating to a compromise agreement signed on 10 November 2021 as not well founded. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.