Case 1801903/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Did not appear and was not represented v Secretary of State for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801903/2022
- Decision date
- 26 October 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not appear and was not represented
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was brought against the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy because the claimant had been unable to recover from Jackson Rushworth Consulting Limited by reason of the company's insolvency. The respondent opposed the claim on the basis that the claimant was not an employee.
The case was listed for hearing on 11 October 2022. The evening before the hearing, the claimant emailed the Tribunal, copying the respondent, stating that he would no longer be contesting the claim and would not attend. Employment Judge Shulman treated that statement as a withdrawal, and the claim was dismissed on that basis.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment describes only a single claim against the Secretary of State arising because the claimant was unable to recover from Jackson Rushworth Consulting Limited due to the company's insolvency. It does not identify the specific statutory head of claim in the judgment text. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.