Case 1801916/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss L Edgerton v Abbeycare & Nursing @ Home Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801916/2022
- Decision date
- 4 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss L Edgerton
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal struck out Miss L Edgerton's claim against Abbeycare & Nursing @ Home Ltd because she failed to pay a deposit of £25 that had been ordered after a preliminary hearing on 28 June 2022. The order for the deposit was sent to her on 6 July 2022.
The judgment records that the deposit was not paid. On that basis, the tribunal applied rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and struck out the claim.
Because the claim was struck out for non-payment of the deposit, the hearing fixed for 3 November 2022 did not take place. The judgment does not make findings on the merits of the underlying claim or award any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The tribunal struck out the claim after the claimant failed to pay a £25 deposit ordered following a preliminary hearing on 28 June 2022. The order was sent on 6 July 2022. The judgment does not determine the substance of the claim. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.