Case 1801933/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Abbott v Coe and Co Fine Jewelry Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1801933/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Abbott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Abbott did not attend the hearing. The respondent, Coe and Co Fine Jewelry Limited, was represented by Ms Priestley. The case was heard by Employment Judge Moxon at Leeds via CVP on 5 July 2022.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages owed. It also found that the respondent breached the contract by failing to pay notice pay. On those findings, the tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £627.84, described as the total gross sum owed.
A further breach of contract claim, based on an allegation that the respondent failed to return property in its possession, was dismissed. The judgment does not record any separate award split between the successful claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages by failing to pay the claimant the full amount of wages owed. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found a breach of contract for failure to pay notice pay. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal dismissed the separate breach of contract claim arising from the allegation that the respondent failed to return property in its possession. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £628
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.