Case 1801947/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T A Mohamed Khar v [1] CK Fast Food Suppliers Limited [2] Mr Masoom Bhamji — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801947/2019
- Decision date
- 16 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Mr D Wilks, Dr D Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T A Mohamed Khar
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal did not determine the merits of any claim. Instead, on 16 January 2020, Employment Judge D N Jones, sitting with Mr D Wilks and Dr D Bright at Hull, recorded a consent order staying the proceedings so the parties could implement the terms of settlement.
The order provided that the proceedings would stand dismissed upon withdrawal unless either party notified the tribunal in writing before 13 February 2020 to restore them. It also required the parties to notify the tribunal forthwith that the settlement terms had been implemented.
No liability findings, legal tests, or monetary award were recorded in this judgment. The only outcome stated was a consent stay pending settlement implementation, with dismissal by withdrawal contemplated if the matter was not restored by the specified date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claims in this case reference. It records that, by consent, the proceedings were stayed to allow the parties to implement terms of settlement, with the case to stand dismissed upon withdrawal unless restored by 13 February 2020. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.