Case 1801948/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Mutereko v Whitbread Group plc AT A HEARING — 2019
- Case reference
- 1801948/2019
- Decision date
- 12 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- Mr R Stead, Mrs J Rathbone
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Mutereko
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds on 11 and 12 November 2019 before Employment Judge Lancaster, with members Mr R Stead and Mrs J Rathbone. Mr T Mutereko appeared in person and Whitbread Group plc was represented by Mr M Foster, solicitor.
The tribunal found that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract. It ordered the respondent to pay him agreed gross damages of £427.68.
All other complaints were dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wrongful dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant was wrongfully dismissed in breach of contract and orders agreed gross damages of £427.68. | Upheld | — | £428 |
| Race discrimination | All other complaints were dismissed. The extracted text gives no separate reasoning for the race discrimination complaint. | Dismissed | Race | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | All other complaints were dismissed. The extracted text gives no separate reasoning for the wages complaint. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £428
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £428
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.