Case 1801965/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Fraser v Accentia Corporate Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801965/2023
- Decision date
- 17 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Fraser
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 15 April 2023. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 without a full hearing.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages in respect of unpaid wages for December 2022 and January 2023. It declared the claim established and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £709.37.
The hearing listed for 19 July 2023 was cancelled. The judgment was signed by Employment Judge JM Wade and dated 17 July 2023.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal, proceeding under rule 21 because the respondent did not present a valid response on time, declared that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from wages for unpaid wages in December 2022 and January 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum of £709.37. | Upheld | — | £709 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £709
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.