Case 1801971/2022 · Employment Tribunal
G Oliver v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions AT A HEARING — 2023
- Case reference
- 1801971/2022
- Decision date
- 8 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Members
- Venue
- Leeds
- Panel members
- C Hunter, M Taj
Parties
2 namedClaimant
G Oliver
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Leeds by CVP video conferencing on 7 and 8 March 2023 before Employment Judge Lancaster sitting with members C Hunter and M Taj. The claimant, G Oliver, appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel. The written record states that the tribunal gave reasons orally at the hearing, so no written reasons were provided in the judgment record itself.
The tribunal dismissed both disability discrimination claims: direct disability discrimination and unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability. No further factual findings, remedy findings, or compensation figures are set out in the written judgment record.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Direct disability discrimination claim dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability dismissed. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.