Case 1801980/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr K Land v Process Mechanical Ltd (In Compulsory Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1801980/2019
- Decision date
- 20 January 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rogerson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr K Land
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent company was in compulsory liquidation. The tribunal recorded that the permission of the court had not been obtained for the proceedings to be instituted or continued, as required by the Insolvency Act 1986.
On 30 December 2019 the tribunal gave the claimant 14 days to provide written reasons why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The claimant did not give an acceptable reason.
The judgment therefore struck out the claim. It did not determine the merits of any substantive complaint or record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separately identify the breach of contract head, but the case listing includes this category. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refers only to 'the claim' being struck out and does not separately identify the unfair dismissal head, but the case listing includes this category. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.