Case 1802011/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v MS F Effex Ltd and Others — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802011/2020
- Decision date
- 5 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a short disposal order dated 5 August 2020. It records that the claim against the Fourth Respondent, Garvin Usher, was dismissed because the Claimant withdrew it.
It also records that the claim against the Fifth Respondent, Garic Ltd, was dismissed on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. No substantive liability findings, legal analysis, or remedy assessment are set out in the text provided.
No monetary award is recorded in the judgment extract.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim against the Fourth Respondent, Garvin Usher, was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The claim against the Fifth Respondent, Garic Ltd, was dismissed on the ground that it had no reasonable prospect of success. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.