Case 1802026/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Z Petrauskas v MNT Logistics Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802026/2019
- Decision date
- 26 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rostant
- Venue
- Sheffield
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Z Petrauskas
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing at Sheffield on 26 September 2019 before Employment Judge Rostant sitting alone. The claimant, Mr Z Petrauskas, appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal therefore determined the matter on the basis of the hearing and the evidence before it.
The tribunal upheld the claimant’s claim for unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered the respondent to pay £2,040 gross. It also upheld the claimant’s claim for breach of the contractual term to pay expenses and ordered the respondent to pay £278.5. The judgment does not record any separate injury to feelings, interest, or other additional remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim of unauthorised deductions and orders payment of £2,040 gross. | Upheld | — | £2,040 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment finds a breach of the contractual term to pay expenses and orders payment of £278.5. | Upheld | — | £279 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,319
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.