Case 1802036/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Gossop v 2Excel Management Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802036/2023
- Decision date
- 6 September 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Flanagan
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Gossop
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Flanagan sitting alone at Leeds Employment Tribunal via CVP on 25 August 2023. The only complaint recorded in the judgment was breach of contract relating to notice pay.
The tribunal found that the claimant had been dismissed without adequate notice. On that basis, the complaint of breach of contract was held to be well founded.
The tribunal awarded the claimant £12,083.33 gross, stated to represent two months' notice pay. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal held the complaint of breach of contract relating to notice pay was well founded because the claimant was dismissed without adequate notice. The award was stated to be £12,083.33 gross for 2 months' notice pay. | Upheld | — | £12,083 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,083
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £12,083
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.