Case 1802049/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Veal, lay representative For the v Mr A Bostock, lay representative — 2025
- Case reference
- 1802049/2025
- Decision date
- 12 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge James Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Veal, lay representative For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard the case at Sheffield by video link on 12 December 2025 before Employment Judge James. The claimant was represented by Mr J Veal, a lay representative, and the respondent was represented by Mr A Bostock, a lay representative.
The written judgment records that the claim for unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 did not succeed and was dismissed. The document states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within the relevant time limit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The written judgment states that the claim for unfair dismissal under s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996 does not succeed and is dismissed. Reasons were given orally and are not included in the written record. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.