Case 1802052/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S O’Hara v Gist Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802052/2022
- Decision date
- 5 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moxon Representation
- Venue
- Leeds via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S O’Hara
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal heard claims by Mr S O'Hara against Gist Limited at Leeds via CVP on 5 July 2022, before Employment Judge Moxon. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by counsel.
The judgment records that the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, described as failure to pay sick pay and holiday pay, failed and was dismissed. It also records that the claimant's breach of contract claim, described as failure to pay notice pay, failed and was dismissed.
No monetary award or remedy was made in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as a claim for unauthorised deduction from wages, namely failure to pay sick pay and holiday pay, and states it fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Holiday pay is expressly included within the unauthorised deduction from wages claim; the judgment states that claim fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment describes this as a breach of contract claim, namely failure to pay notice pay, and states it fails and is dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.