Case 1802066/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Gilfillan v Sticky Sisters Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802066/2019
- Decision date
- 13 September 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss T Gilfillan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy a letter dated 28 August 2019, the Tribunal gave Miss T Gilfillan an opportunity to make written representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out. The stated grounds were that the claimant had not complied with the Tribunal's order of 28 August 2019 and that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make representations in writing, or did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the Tribunal struck out the claim.
The judgment records that the hearing listed for 18 September 2019 would not take place.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim was struck out under rule 37 after the claimant failed to make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the Tribunal's letter dated 28 August 2019. The Tribunal said the claim had not complied with the order of 28 August 2019 and had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.