Case 1802074/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Theaker v Huby’s domestic appliance Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802074/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Theaker
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr N Theaker, brought complaints against Huby’s domestic appliance Limited concerning unpaid notice pay, arrears of pay and other payments. On 13 June 2022, he was asked to provide information about the sums he was claiming. When there was no reply, an Employment Judge sent a warning on 27 June 2022 that the claim was being considered for strike out and set a deadline of 4 July 2022 for a response.
The claimant did not respond by that date. The tribunal therefore struck out the claim and vacated the hearing listed for the following day. No remedy was awarded because the complaints did not proceed to a substantive hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment refers to the complaint as unpaid notice pay and strikes it out together with the other wage-related complaints. | Struck out | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to arrears of pay and other payments and strikes out those complaints together with the unpaid notice pay complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.