Case 1802082/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Bray v Total Lindsey Oil Refinery Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802082/2019
- Decision date
- 11 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Bray
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr D Bray brought two unfair dismissal claims against Total Lindsey Oil Refinery Limited. One was pleaded on the basis that he had made a protected disclosure under section 103A of the Employment Rights Act 1996. The other was pleaded on the basis that he had been engaged in trade union activities under section 152(1) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The hearing took place by telephone at Hull on 11 October 2019 before Employment Judge D N Jones.
At that hearing, both claims were withdrawn and the tribunal dismissed them upon withdrawal. The judgment records no findings on liability, no remedy assessment, and no monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing | The claim was for unfair dismissal on the ground that the claimant had made a protected disclosure under section 103A ERA 1996. It was dismissed upon withdrawal at the 11 October 2019 hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Trade union | The claim was for unfair dismissal on the ground that the claimant was engaged in trade union activities under section 152(1) TULR(C)A 1992. It was dismissed upon withdrawal at the 11 October 2019 hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- s.103A ERA 1996
- s.152(1) TULR(C)A 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.