Case 1802111/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss B Duggan v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802111/2021
- Decision date
- 31 August 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss B Duggan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant had been ordered, following a preliminary hearing on 8 July 2021, to pay a deposit of £10 per complaint. The order was sent to the claimant on 22 July 2021.
The claimant did not pay the deposit for all of the complaints. The tribunal therefore struck out the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments by failing to provide counselling support and failing to provide line management, and the complaint of wrongful dismissal, under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment stated that the claimant's remaining claims would proceed to a hearing, with the date to be notified.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the complaints of failure to make reasonable adjustments by failing to provide counselling support and failing to provide line management, after the claimant failed to pay the ordered deposit. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Wrongful dismissal | The wrongful dismissal complaint was struck out after the claimant failed to pay the ordered deposit. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.