Case 1802140/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr W Mandinyenya v Linburg Touring Limited and 1 other — 2023
- Case reference
- 1802140/2023
- Decision date
- 21 June 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Davies Appearances
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mr W Mandinyenya
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBoth respondents had filed ET3 responses but did not attend the CVP hearing. The tribunal noted that notice of the hearing had been sent at the same time as the claims were served, attempted to contact the respondents without success, and proceeded in their absence while taking the ET3 responses into account. The Claimant attended and gave oral evidence.
The tribunal substituted Linburg Touring (Sales) Ltd as the correct respondent to claim 1802140/2023 and dismissed that claim because Linburg did not employ the Claimant. It substituted Coach Pro UK Ltd as the correct respondent to claim 1802141/2023, and Coach accepted that it employed the Claimant.
The Claimant's unauthorised deduction from wages claim against Coach Pro UK Ltd was found well-founded and succeeded. Coach was ordered to pay £1,050, described in the judgment as seven days' pay from 17 January 2023 to 25 January 2023 inclusive at £14.50 per day for ten hours per day. The Claimant was made responsible for any tax or National Insurance due on that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim 1802140/2023 was substituted to Linburg Touring (Sales) Ltd and dismissed because the tribunal found that Linburg did not employ the Claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Coach Pro UK Ltd was substituted as the correct respondent to claim 1802141/2023, accepted that it employed the Claimant, and the unauthorised deduction from wages claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | £1,050 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,050
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.