Case 1802154/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D A Borom v Yorfit Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802154/2022
- Decision date
- 28 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D A Borom
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued on 4 May 2022 and the respondent failed to present a valid response in time, so the Employment Judge determined the matter under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. On that basis, the tribunal made findings on the paper record and ordered payment of the sums awarded in the judgment.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,069.33 gross. It also found that the claimant had resigned in response to the respondent's repudiatory breaches of contract and awarded £479.25 gross in respect of one week's notice pay as damages for breach of contract.
The tribunal further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £670.95 gross. The judgment records a total sum due of £2,219.53, and notes that the notice-pay award was made gross in light of the HMRC treatment of post-employment notice pay, with the claimant responsible for any tax and employee national insurance due on the sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £1,069.33 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
| Breach of contract | The claimant resigned in response to the respondent's repudiatory breaches of contract and was awarded one week's notice pay as damages, in the sum of £479.25 gross. | Upheld | — | £479 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £670.95 gross. | Upheld | — | £671 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,220
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.