Case 1802155/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Butterfield v Countrywide Residential Lettings t/a City Lets York Countrywide Limited Heard on 14 July 2022 by CVP — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802155/2022
- Decision date
- 14 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Butterfield
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss S Butterfield brought claims for constructive unfair dismissal, age discrimination and sex discrimination against Countrywide Residential Lettings t/a City Lets York Countrywide Limited. The case was heard on 14 July 2022 by CVP before Employment Judge D N Jones.
The tribunal dismissed the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal because it was presented out of time. The judgment does not record any substantive findings on the merits of that claim.
The age and sex discrimination complaints were dismissed upon withdrawal. The judgment does not record any remedy, liability findings, or compensation award.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The tribunal stated that the complaint of constructive unfair dismissal was dismissed because it was presented out of time. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Age discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the age discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Age | — |
| Sex discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the sex discrimination complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | Sex | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.