Case 1802187/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v O’Malley v Crown Prosecution Service — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802187/2020
- Decision date
- 1 May 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a hearing in public at Leeds on 1 May 2024 before Employment Judge Deeley on the respondent’s strike out application dated 24 October 2023. The tribunal refused the application under Rule 37(1)(e) of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure.
The reason given was that a fair hearing of the claim remained possible on the final hearing dates listed for July 2024. The judgment does not determine the underlying substantive claim, and it records no remedy or liability finding beyond the refusal of the strike out application.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment is a procedural decision on the respondent’s strike out application under Rule 37(1)(e), not a merits determination of a substantive claim. The application was refused because the tribunal considered a fair hearing of the claim possible at the final hearing listed for July 2024. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37(1)(e) Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.