Case 1802210/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A WHITE v T2 Outsourcing Ltd Trading As Seamless Umbrella — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802210/2022
- Decision date
- 4 July 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JM Wade
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A WHITE
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 10 May 2022. The respondent failed to present a valid response on time, so the Employment Judge proceeded under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 and determined the claim on the papers.
The tribunal found that T2 Outsourcing Ltd Trading As Seamless Umbrella had made unauthorised deductions from Mr A White's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £9,534.05 gross. No separate split of the award was given in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment entered under Rule 21 after the respondent failed to present a valid response on time. The tribunal found unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of £9,534.05 gross. | Upheld | — | £9,534 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,534
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.