Case 1802225/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M O’Ceafarcaigh v Yorkshire Water Services — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802225/2020
- Decision date
- 14 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M O’Ceafarcaigh
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented race discrimination claims on 22 April 2020 after early conciliation on 17 January 2020 and an early conciliation certificate dated 1 February 2020. He said the less favourable treatment was because of his Irish nationality. The tribunal noted that at the earlier private preliminary hearing the claimant had identified three live matters: an alleged failure to make arrangements for him to benefit from the respondent's pension scheme, alleged less favourable treatment compared with colleagues in a training scheme, and refusal of a 12-month career break. He also confirmed that a religion discrimination claim would not proceed and that harassment allegations were only background information.
The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 28 September 2019 and treated that as the date of the act complained of. On that basis, the primary limitation period under section 123 Equality Act 2010 had expired before early conciliation began, and the ET1 filed on 22 April 2020 was out of time. Applying the just and equitable test and citing Robertson v Bexley Community Centre, Abertawe Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan, and Accurist Watches Ltd v Wadher, the tribunal accepted that the claimant did not know the limitation date, but found that this ignorance was not reasonable, that he was at fault in not enquiring earlier, and that there had been no misleading conduct by the respondent. It declined to extend time and struck out the direct race discrimination claims in their entirety for lack of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Direct race discrimination claim under section 13 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal struck it out because it was presented out of time and refused to extend time on a just and equitable basis. The claimant said the alleged reason for the treatment was his Irish nationality. The religion discrimination complaint did not proceed and harassment was treated as background only. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- just and equitable extension
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre
- Abertawe Morgannwg University Local Health Board v Morgan
- Accurist Watches Ltd v Wadher
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.