Case 1802227/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C Sharp v Playtopia Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802227/2020
- Decision date
- 8 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Cox Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C Sharp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's claims for notice pay, holiday pay and unpaid wages succeeded. It did not quantify those sums in this judgment. Instead, it ordered the claimant by 17 July 2020 to send the tribunal and the respondent a written statement setting out what she claimed in respect of each item and how each sum had been calculated.
The tribunal also dealt with the unfair dismissal claim separately. It said that it proposed to strike out that claim because the claimant had not completed the two years' service usually required to qualify to bring an unfair dismissal claim. The judgment gave the claimant until 17 July 2020 to object in writing, copied to the respondent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for notice pay succeeds, but it does not yet quantify the sum; the claimant was directed to provide a written statement of calculation by 17 July 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claim for holiday pay succeeds, but no amount was determined in this decision; the claimant was directed to provide a written statement of calculation by 17 July 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claim for unpaid wages succeeds, but no amount was determined in this decision; the claimant was directed to provide a written statement of calculation by 17 July 2020. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal proposed to strike out the unfair dismissal claim because the claimant had not completed the two years' service usually required to qualify to bring that claim. The judgment invited objections by 17 July 2020, so this was presented as a proposal rather than a final disposal in the text supplied. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.