Case 1802228/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Sharp v Playtopia Limited (in Voluntary Liquidation) — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802228/2020
- Decision date
- 11 August 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Sharp
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that Miss M Sharp's complaints of unfair dismissal, pregnancy discrimination, holiday pay, arrears of pay and failure to provide a written pay statement were dismissed after withdrawal by the claimant. The judgment is dated 11 August 2020 and is described as a rule 52 judgment on withdrawal.
The document contains no findings on the merits of any of the underlying complaints and does not record any monetary award. It is therefore a disposal following withdrawal rather than a substantive determination of liability.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Holiday pay | Dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears of pay complaint dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | Failure to provide written pay statement dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant; no merits finding. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.