Case 1802240/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr R Lycett v Gingernut Monkey Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802240/2020
- Decision date
- 1 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Deeley Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr R Lycett
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt only with the unfair dismissal complaint at this stage. It had written to the claimant on 26 October 2020 giving him an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why that complaint should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 26/10/2020.
The claimant did not make written representations, did not make sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the unfair dismissal complaint under rule 37.
The judgment records that the claimant's remaining claim or claims remained listed for hearing on 26 January 2021. No remedy was assessed for the struck-out unfair dismissal complaint.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Struck out under rule 37 after the claimant did not comply with the Tribunal's order dated 26/10/2020 and did not make sufficient written representations or request a hearing in response to the warning letter dated 26/10/2020. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.