Case 1802241/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Nelson v High Street Kitchens And Bathrooms — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802241/2020
- Decision date
- 9 June 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Nelson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Maidment determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that High Street Kitchens and Bathrooms had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr J Nelson's wages and ordered the respondent to pay him the net sum of £929.73.
The tribunal also found that Mr Nelson was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. On that claim, the respondent was ordered to pay damages of £1,542.76.
No other claims, findings, or remedies are recorded in the extracted judgment text. The combined monetary sum of the two awards is £2,472.49.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages and ordered payment of the net sum of £929.73. | Upheld | — | £930 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £1,542.76. | Upheld | — | £1,543 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,472
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.