Case 1802254/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Robinson v Drs Turpin and Lee t/a Park View Surgery — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802254/2019
- Decision date
- 10 October 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shulman Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs S Robinson worked as a healthcare assistant for Drs Turpin and Lee t/a Park View Surgery from 28 August 2015 until 2 April 2019. She alleged that she had been unfairly constructively dismissed. The tribunal recorded a series of disputes after Dr Jennifer Loke became director of the practice, including disagreement over blood results, a job advert for additional support in the practice, an appraisal, a request for a pay rise, and an incident said to involve Dr Loke touching or grabbing the claimant's right wrist.
The tribunal preferred the written resignation letter over the later email, which it treated as an attempt to clarify the earlier letter. It found that both the claimant and Dr Loke gave conflicting accounts, that neither was independently corroborated by oral evidence, and that the claimant had not discharged the burden of proving that she resigned because of the respondent's conduct in circumstances entitling her to leave without notice. Applying section 95(1)(c) of the Employment Rights Act 1996, it was not satisfied that the claimant had been dismissed in law.
As a result, the claim for unfair dismissal was dismissed and the associated notice pay claim also failed. The separate claim for 'other payment' in the claim form was dismissed because the claimant withdrew it.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Constructive unfair dismissal allegation under s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996; tribunal found the claimant had not proved that her resignation amounted to a dismissal by reason of the respondent's conduct. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim; tribunal held the claimant was not entitled to notice pay. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | The 'other payment' claim in the claim form was dismissed on withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.