Case 1802312/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs R Svirpliene v Hotelcare Facilities Management Ltd — 2020
- Case reference
- 1802312/2020
- Decision date
- 7 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tegerdine Representation
- Venue
- Hull
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs R Svirpliene
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs R Svirpliene brought claims against Hotelcare Facilities Management Ltd including unpaid furlough pay, unlawful deduction from wages, and breach of contract. The hearing took place on 1 December 2020 before Employment Judge Tegerdine. The tribunal recorded that the unpaid furlough pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant.
The tribunal found the unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract claims well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £1,231.59 in respect of work undertaken by the claimant up to 31 March 2020 and £849.58 in respect of holiday pay owed for the same period.
The judgment ordered payment of a gross total of £2,081.17, payable on or before 15 December 2020. The judgment does not set out any separate breakdown of that total between the unlawful deduction from wages and breach of contract findings.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The claim for unpaid furlough pay was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the unlawful deduction from wages claim well founded and ordered payment of £1,231.59 for work undertaken up to 31 March 2020 and £849.58 for holiday pay owed for the same period. | Upheld | — | £2,081 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal also found the breach of contract claim well founded, but the judgment did not allocate a separate monetary sum to that claim; the award was expressed as a gross total. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,081
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.