Case 1802338/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Windle v Tivoli Group Limited AT A PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802338/2021
- Decision date
- 20 December 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Lancaster Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Windle
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Lancaster in Leeds by CVP on 20 December 2021. The tribunal recorded that Mr G Windle was dismissed on one month's contractual notice commencing on 31 October 2020 and expiring at the end of November 2020.
On that basis, the tribunal found that he had the requisite two years' continuous employment to bring a claim of unfair dismissal. The judgment did not determine the merits of the dismissal claim; it simply resolved the preliminary employment-length issue in the claimant's favour.
The case was directed to be listed for final hearing on 11 April 2022, with separate case management orders also made.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Preliminary hearing only. The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed on one month's contractual notice starting on 31 October 2020 and ending at the end of November 2020, so he had the requisite two years' continuous employment to bring an unfair dismissal claim. No final liability decision on the merits was made. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.