Case 1802339/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Carter v Mondial Lighting Co Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802339/2021
- Decision date
- 24 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Carter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing at Leeds by CVP on 24 September 2021, Employment Judge Anderson dealt with Mr P Carter's claims against Mondial Lighting Co Ltd. The tribunal dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages in respect of the £125 fine because it was not presented within the time limit in s23 Employment Rights Act 1996 and it was reasonably practicable to do so in time.
The tribunal also dismissed the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages relating to disputed overnight subsistence payments of £60, holding that it was not well founded. All other complaints succeeded.
By consent, the respondent was ordered to pay £798 for outstanding wages, £742 for outstanding holiday pay and £20 for outstanding subsistence allowance, giving a total of £1,560. The written record notes that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint about the £125 fine was not presented within the time limit in s23 Employment Rights Act 1996; the tribunal held it was reasonably practicable to present it in time and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint about disputed overnight subsistence payments of £60 was not well founded and was dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Other | All other complaints succeeded. By consent, the respondent was to pay £798 outstanding wages, £742 outstanding holiday pay and £20 outstanding subsistence allowance. | Upheld | — | £1,560 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,560
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- s23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- reasonably practicable
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.