Case 1802351/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Moran v 1) Gymfix Solutions Limited 2) Mr Stephen Seymour — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802351/2021
- Decision date
- 16 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Moran
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a withdrawal rule 52 judgment. It records that the complaints of disability discrimination, unauthorised deductions from wages, and non-payment of holiday pay were dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant, Mr P Moran. No merits findings are made on those claims in this judgment.
The same judgment records that the claimant’s remaining complaints of age discrimination, unfair dismissal, and breach of contract in respect of notice or notice pay would proceed to a hearing. This decision therefore disposes only of the withdrawn claims and does not determine the merits of the remaining claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The tribunal recorded that the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal recorded that the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal recorded that the complaint was dismissed following withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 52
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.