Case 1802372/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs S Kuhlman v The Secretary of State for Justice — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802372/2023
- Decision date
- 11 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller
- Venue
- Hull
- Panel members
- Mr M Taj, Mr D Crowe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs S Kuhlman
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the claimant's complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability was well-founded and succeeded.
The tribunal also recorded that the claimant's complaint of unfair dismissal was well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. Remedy was not determined in this judgment and was left to a further hearing.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment states the complaint of unfavourable treatment because of something arising in consequence of disability is well-founded and succeeds. Remedy is to be determined at a further hearing. | Upheld | Disability | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states the unfair dismissal complaint is well-founded and that the claimant was unfairly dismissed. Remedy is to be determined at a further hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.