Case 1802406/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr E Itua v Cordant Security Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 1802406/2019
- Decision date
- 21 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Brain REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr E Itua
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a private preliminary hearing, the tribunal gave the claimant permission to amend his claim to include a claim of victimisation under sections 27 and 39(4) of the Equality Act 2010.
The protected act relied on was the claimant's notification to ACAS of a discrimination complaint under section 18A of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996. The judgment recorded that the victimisation allegations were connected with the fourth, fifth and seventh claims referred to in the minute of the preliminary hearing.
The judgment did not decide the merits of the victimisation allegations, any discrimination complaint, or any remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The tribunal granted permission to amend the claim to include victimisation under sections 27 and 39(4) of the Equality Act 2010. This was not a merits determination of the victimisation allegations. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 27 Equality Act 2010
- section 39(4) Equality Act 2010
- section 18A Employment Tribunals Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.