Case 1802411/2022 · Employment Tribunal
D Knippenborg v Wayward Son Limited (dissolved) and 1 other — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802411/2022
- Decision date
- 9 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Date
Parties
3 namedClaimant
D Knippenborg
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Leeds Employment Tribunals on 16 May 2022. The respondents failed to present a valid response on time, and the Employment Judge made a determination under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.
The judgment dismissed the claim against the first respondent, Wayward Son Limited, because it was a dissolved company. As to the second respondent, Mr John Wolski, the tribunal found that he had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement.
The tribunal therefore ordered the second respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £263.06. No separate breakdown of remedy components was given beyond that gross amount.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | The tribunal said the claim against the first respondent was dismissed because it was a dissolved company. It found the second respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £263.06 gross. | Upheld | — | £263 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £263
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.