Case 1802414/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms M Hill v MHXB Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802414/2023
- Decision date
- 2 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms M Hill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Ms M Hill, succeeded on two complaints against MHXB Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation). The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on 28 August 2022 and ordered the respondent to pay £216.79, described as the gross sum deducted. The claimant was responsible for any tax or National Insurance on that payment.
The tribunal also found that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay holiday pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended. It ordered payment of £228.09 for that claim, with the claimant again responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
On timeliness, the tribunal recorded that the claim was presented outside the applicable time limit but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time, and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. The judgment does not record any other disputed issues or any separate remedy assessment beyond the two sums awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on 28 August 2022 and awarded the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £217 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages because holiday accrued but untaken at the end of employment was not paid. | Upheld | — | £228 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £445
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.