Case 1802418/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Green v MHXB Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 1802418/2023
- Decision date
- 2 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Miller Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs N Green brought claims against MHXB Ltd (In Creditors Voluntary Liquidation) for unauthorised deductions from wages and holiday pay. At a hearing in Hull by video on 2 January 2024, Employment Judge Miller found the claim for unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded. The tribunal held that the respondent made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages on 28 August 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, £170.31, with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The tribunal also found the holiday pay complaint well-founded. It held that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages by failing to pay the claimant for holidays accrued but not taken on the date her employment ended. The respondent was ordered to pay £223.44, again with the claimant responsible for any tax or National Insurance.
The written record also notes that the claim was presented outside the applicable time limit, but that it was not reasonably practicable to present it in time and that it was presented within a further reasonable period. The judgment does not split any additional remedy beyond the two sums awarded on the individual complaints.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages on 28 August 2022 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted. | Upheld | — | £170 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages arising from failure to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when employment ended. | Upheld | — | £223 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £394
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- not reasonably practicable
- further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.