Miss A Oakley v Andrew Bostock Limited — 2019

Case reference: 1802437/2019
Decision date: 26 July 2019
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Cox Date

Indexed: 22 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss A Oakley

Respondent

Andrew Bostock Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The tribunal recorded that the Claimant's claim for a redundancy payment was withdrawn by the Claimant and dismissed on that basis. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the redundancy claim and no monetary award.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Redundancy	The judgment records that the claim for a redundancy payment was dismissed on withdrawal by the Claimant.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.