Case 1802440/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M.S. Ramey v Gane Datascan Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 1802440/2021
- Decision date
- 8 June 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R.Smith Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M.S. Ramey
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt Leeds on 8 June 2021, before Employment Judge T.R. Smith, the claimant appeared in person and the respondent did not attend. The tribunal found the claimant's breach of contract complaint for expenses to be well founded and ordered the respondent, Gane Datascan Ltd (in creditors voluntary liquidation), to pay £239.31 forthwith.
The tribunal also found well founded the claimant's complaint concerning non-payment of holiday pay, pleaded as breach of contract and breach of regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998. It ordered payment of £4,463.25 forthwith.
The claimant's unlawful deduction from wages complaint concerning non-payment of overtime was dismissed on withdrawal. The judgment records no separate split between different heads of remedy beyond the two sums awarded, which total £4,702.56.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Expenses. | Upheld | — | £239 |
| Holiday pay | Breach of contract and breach of regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998; non-payment of holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £4,463 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Non-payment of overtime; dismissed on withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,703
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.