Case 1802442/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Ms C Fearn v The Houndville Ltd — 2022
- Case reference
- 1802442/2022
- Decision date
- 5 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Maidment Representation
- Venue
- Leeds
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms C Fearn
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 5 August 2022, Employment Judge Maidment recorded that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant’s wages. The respondent did not attend. The judgment therefore upheld the wages claim on the basis recorded in the written judgment.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay the claimant gross arrears of wages of £674.69. It also ordered payment of gross £114 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement as at the termination of the claimant’s employment. No other remedies were recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the respondent made unauthorised deductions from wages and ordered payment of gross arrears of £674.69. | Upheld | — | £675 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal also ordered payment of gross £114 in respect of accrued but untaken holiday entitlement at the termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £114 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £789
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.